5 Essential Tips for Maximizing Your Experience at Nutanix .NEXT for Bloggers
Hi guys, I'm still digging to give corrects answer to my manager who is puting pros and cons for nutanix on the table. As I need to make a design without knowing exactly where he want to go, I'm making assomption on it. I understood that they wanted to put NSX on it VRA and vCloud SP. I've found a couple of recommandations / tips on NSX over NUTANIX but nothing that can be used on design part (more on implementation which is quite cool !) Do someone have integrated it on a 4.5 cluster ? do Nutanix plan to give us a technical note / any other cool stuff on NSX ? sheers,
Hi folks ! My client asked me a quite though question today : since we are bounded to CISCO Nexus for physical switches, we digged on a low latency nexus with SFP+ connection. It seems that 3064-X is a good choice but as far as I know, Cisco SFP+ compatibility with 3rd party is azardeous. 2 questions : Are there some kind of hardware restriction w/ Nutanix Supermicro stuff appart from SFP+ cable (MOLEX 074752 series as far as I know) ? Is there a compatibility matrix of this granularity level somewhere ? best regards,
Hi all, My present client is making me working on a design implying to deploy a XAAS plateform with a lot of security inside (NSX is on the cook list). In our team, i was declared as the nutanix man. My mission is to determine the best way to isolate storage from diffrent workload : we'll have an integration zone, a developpement and a production zone as PAAS. Some node will executed heavy VDI (K2 graphic cards will achieve this), Then we'll have a IAAS with vcloud SP for the sandbox zone).So we can imagine some sort of multicluster with 3 cluster dedicated to 3 zones : 3D VDI zone / SANDBOX IAAS zone / and PAAS zone. It implies at least 9 nodes which is a bit too much for starting plateform. My question is, can I make a 6 node cluster for nutanix / storage point, with 3 volumes pools on all 6 node ? and more than that what will it implies in terms of storage performance, data protection, data seggregation (security team will challenge me heavily on this part) ? Last but not
Hi all ! My client have encountered a strange behaviour on some of its Nutanix-Dell Blocks and i'd like to share the resolution on this. Thanks to Nutanix / Dell support team for their 'patience' with IT team on this false-positive critical alert resolution. context : Multiple critical alert Seen on PRISM : FAN SPEED LOW for a whole cluster (this mean all FANS on ALL blocks). No alerts detected on IPMI / IDRAC and VIclient (directly on ESXi for HW messaging). HW: DELL XC 630-10 SW : NOS 4.6.4 HV : ESX 6.0 u2 Resolution : This is a false positive message which occurs when NOS cannot correctly interpret IPMI messaging due to a miconfig on a /etc/nutanix/hardware_config.json. the sensor of type "fans : rpm" has a misconfig on its adress. GOOD adress is "ipmi_sensor:FAN" BAD adress is "ipmi_sensor:FAN RPM" resolution will be to modify this descriptor for each FAN (14 on a XC630-10 model) on each host. If you encounter this kind of issue, please contact NUTANIX / DELL suppor
Already have an account? Login
Enter your username or e-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
Sorry, we're still checking this file's contents to make sure it's safe to download. Please try again in a few minutes.
Sorry, our virus scanner detected that this file isn't safe to download.