5 Essential Tips for Maximizing Your Experience at Nutanix .NEXT for Bloggers
@Chaitrali Deshpande @allanstreymoy What is the other way than upgrading an existing 18.04. I would like to install a fresh ubuntu-20.04.1-live-server-amd64 on a VM? I get the same Error using the Community Edition im my Home Lab.
Get disk info:- lsblkRe-add as "failed" identified disk:- ncli disk list-tombstone-entries- ncli disk rm-tombstone-entry serial-number=*SERIAL*- ncli disk list-tombstone-entries
@Neel Kotak @bcaballero @Alona thank you for your help!I can report back with a classic: “did you try to turn it off and on again?”. It was a lot of hassle just because I didn’t reboot the hosts after reconfiguring the NICs. What a fool. Now I have to find out how to fix the routing and I am ready for some VMs.
Hi @bcaballero Thank you for your inputs!As desired I don’t see any tags (exept with “vnet3”): Is there any more configuration needed on Nutanix side (like a native VLAN ID for the virtual switch or something like that)?I would like to use VLAN 1 as the native vLAN and that is what I tried:EACH PORT:interface gi1/0/3 switchport trunk native vlan 1 interface gi1/0/4 switchport trunk native vlan 1...LAG (it looks like "Po" stands for the link aggregation)interface Po1 switchport trunk native vlan 1 interface Po2 switchport trunk native vlan 1…I didn’t use “switchport mode trunk” because I configured the ports already as “trunk” via the GUI. I don’t know why I am able to configure this per port and per LAG. In my eyes if LAG is enabled I shouldn’t be allowed to configure it per port of a LAG.I’m not sure if I have to store the configuration or bring it to effect when using the command line and I didn’t find out how to read those settings (to check if I did it right). What I know is that
@bcaballero Thank you for your input :) I did not configure any VLAN on hosts or CVMs (I think I read in the docs that this is the preferred way). Therefore I expect host/CVMs/Prism to be in the default VLAN 1 (or is it called 0?). How do I check if this assumption is correct? I have all other ports (connected devices) on the physical switch in explicit vLANs and therefore only the Nutanix cluster in the default vLAN. I want to configure the ports for br0 (4×1Gb x 4 hosts) on the physical switch as "trunk" with LACP and "all vLANs". But then I can't connect to Nutanix hosts/CVMs/Prism via physical switch. How can I achieve that or what am I missing?The bridge "mgmt" was just a test that i was not able to delete at the time. Shouldn't be a problem for now, right?I have a concept in my head where the 4x1Gb per host go from physical switch "directly" to a main virtual switch that connects hosts/CVM/Prism. If I trunk two physical switches vLANs work between those switches but I can only g
@Neel Kotak See the following screens I was preparing in parallel:I tried to connect to the physical switch (Cisco SG350X) via Trunk/LACP but then I can’t access Nutanix Hosts/CVMs/Prism. Access works using “Access” configuration:I would like to use “Trunk” to put VMs in different vLANs.
Already have an account? Login
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
Sorry, we're still checking this file's contents to make sure it's safe to download. Please try again in a few minutes.
Sorry, our virus scanner detected that this file isn't safe to download.