Hello All,

I'm working with a customer on a new solution design

the customer has a VMware workload and we plan to put AHV,

I want you to advise me on how I calculate the storage requirement, Let’s say the customer workload is about 170 TB how do i size the cluster storage

Also, I have some questions related to storage sizes

if I have 3 nodes cluster

each node with 10 disks each disk 4 TB (numbers for examples only)

that means total raw storage is 120 TB

we will go with RF2 which means 1 node is out of our usable capacity calculation

So what is the usable capacity here after the 1 node for failure and the Raid used in the cluster creation, also what else should be conducted from the storage in storage planning?

Hello @Teko Yasin

First, to calculate the usable capacity you need it's better to do it via Nutanix Sizer, and you have to provide workloads usable storage, however to convert RAW storage to usable storage with RF2 HDD is not enough, in Nutanix SSD contribute in the usable capacity. Calc all (HDD + SSD) x 0.82 / 2 = usable storage.

Second, you have to check hardware compatibility.

Third, the usable capacity after Node failure is very simple, after doing the above calculation, if they are 3 node sub. 33%.

Forth, Nutanix doesn't use RAID, Nutanix uses Replication Factor+Data locality. which means in RF2 one full copy of the vm located where the vm reside, and the second copy chunks to 1-4 mb and distributed on the entire nodes in the cluster.

thank you for your reply, can you explain what is the sum (calc all (HDD + SSD) x 0.82 / 2 = usable storage) based on?

and should I remove 1 node after this sum to get the usable capacity?

ex:

3 nodes cluster with 406 TB (SSD+HDD)

The sum will equal:166.46

usable will be: 110 TB?

406 TB raw storage provides only 110 TB usable !?

Hello @Teko Yasin

If all disk (SSD+HDD) RAW = 406TB then we will sub. slack and overhear 18% = 333 then divided on the Replication factor 2 (Like if you do for RAID1 in traditional solution) = 167 TB « that’s the usable storage with data redundancy 2 copies, in node failure scenario will be = 110 TB  your data still available and no data lose. and you can add from 10-30% data saving (Compression and Dedup) will be for ex. 132TB N-1 or without Node failure will be 200TB

On the other hand (vSAN) (in a simple way) the same calc BUT you will remove the SSDs size from the calc because in vSAN SSD doesn’t contribute in the data store, and increase the slack and overhead to 25-30% instead of 18%

what do you mean by we will sub. slack and overhear 18%?

Yes subtract 18% from the total RAW capacity then divide on the number of replication factor 2.