Connecting Cloud Innovators: Building Community at .NEXT 2024
We have a customer running AOS 5.10 with the newest version of LCM. For some reason, the AOS upgrades are not showed in the “updates” tab on the LCM software. The only thing that i do was run inventory (not runned since years). I understand there is an upgrade order… but i want to make sure if anything needs to be done to LCM shows this AOS upgrades.
Hello!Our customer "ASSA" have recently deployed a new nutanix node (NX-1175S-G7) , this new node is already on rack and cabled to the respective switches.We have 3 nodes on NX-1065S and 1 node on NX-1065-G6AOS Version: 5.9.2.3The problem is:-On Prism > Hardware > Overview i can see 1 new discovered node-But when i click on "Expand Cluster" it doesn't show this new node to do the process I tried the command: ncli cluster discover-nodes with this result:nutanix@NTNX-16SM13440170-A-CVM:10.63.4.16:~$ ncli cluster discover-nodesArch : x86_64Cluster Id :Controller Vm Address :Controller Vm Gateway :Controller Vm Netmask :Current Network Interface : eth2Foundation Version : unknownHypervisor : phoenixHypervisor Address :Hypervisor Gateway :Hypervisor Netmask :Hypervisor Version : phoenix-4.6.2_6e9b7fc8Ip : fe80::2e0:edff:feda:671c%eth0Ipmi Address :Ipmi Gateway :Ipmi Netmask :Node Position : ANode Uuid : e29c0c0e-7e41-4a96-88d8-f4696d456043Nos Version : 0.0Rackable Unit Model : NX-1175
Hello,i have some questions regarding “Switch stacking”1-) Is it possible to use " 2 stacked switches " as TOR with AHV? there will be a problem if we use this configuration?2-) The best practice is to use 2 Stacked switches or 2 individual switches?We plan to use Active-Backup configuration and conect SFP to Switch1 and the other SFP to Switch2I am not a network specialist so i am not sure if both switches are stacked, and we plug 1 SFP to SW1 and the other SFP to SW2, the active passive configuration will work
Hello,have you guys ever configure a 4 SFP + Nutanix cluster with AHV? i understand that the 4 SFP + will be configured as active-passive in a same bond... but only 1 SFP should be used. There is a better way to configure network on AHV to improve and use the other SFP+??? i mean, for example, separate the traffic between user VMs and CVM (storage traffic)
Already have an account? Login
Enter your username or e-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
Sorry, we're still checking this file's contents to make sure it's safe to download. Please try again in a few minutes.
Sorry, our virus scanner detected that this file isn't safe to download.