Connecting Cloud Innovators: Building Community at .NEXT 2024
Good registration numbers here for Nebraska. For me here, I have a feeling not having my CUGCs anymore is going to help my numbers on this side of the fence.
Sweet!! Grats all
Don’t forget about Nebraska here on June 22nd :)
Loving the content you guys are putting out on the podcast. Finally got through some queued up content and sent this over to my team as it is everything I always talk about in regards to vGPU and why the conversation is important. Thanks fellas!
Grats to all existing and new faces to the program!
And don’t leave out that we have the best community manager around with Angelo driving the ship!
Data Locality is easily glossed over with all of the other cool features and since it has just been there since the beginning. But it is so important as a feature that sets NTNX apart from the wanna be copy cats.
well, this is a customer in central time zone and i am assuming they haven't yet changed the CVMs time zone yet, so the endpoint hitting PRISM would be off from PRISM CVM itself and therefore that is what i was wondering would cause it. Cause they are telling me timestamps of what they see in PRISM are what looks like PST versus their laptops which are CST
Not sure i follow then as the laptop (and other endpoints) we are hitting PRISM from is definitely not Pacific time and my timestamps are showing pacific time so that can't be it. That is why i was thinking maybe the CVMs timezone as those are the VMs we are hitting of course to bring up PRISM
CVMs adn Hosts are usually always recommened on the same VLAN for communication purposes. Once imaged, you use the VMNetworkAdapterVlan commands to set the proper VLAN for them as you need and then set can set LACP team bond and remove and disable your 1Gbs, ect if not being used from a Hyper-V standpoint. The scripts will do the 1Gb part for you but if adding to existing cluster, just easier to do it manually using the powershell commands..
Wouldn't i need to be adding them to scvmm manually as the scvmm script from what i know will want to create the failover cluster, etc. which is already done and out there being used by the existing nodes?. Afer looking at setup_hosts script more and the nutanix cluster IP and name it asks for, i know it isn't injecting that anywhere domain wise, so if i put in the same nutanix cluster public IP and nutanix cluster name there as we have setup currently and want each host to use from our existing cluster, it will just need that for local route or host file setup, etc?
Ok, I will let the customer know. This was for a PoC and wanted to make sure we ran the test to show the random read and write IOPS. I will have him open up a case as that would be good for him to go through that process anyway next week so they can see how good and helpful your support is :)
[img]https://d1qy7qyune0vt1.cloudfront.net/nutanix-us/attachment/228i42D811C306D03FC7.png[/img]Here is screenshot of error. Tried from another CVM to make sure:
Im not onsite today, but seeing if i can get customer to run it again for us and send me the exact screenshot for you. stand by..
Essentially that it "can't create container" when it starts the process of trying to create what it needs for the tests. Running it from SSH to one of the CSVs. Didn't have a problem at any point on vSphere with 3.x as I haven't done many of these yet, so was just making sure it shouldn't be problem. You aren't doing anything special to run it right?
Already have an account? Login
Enter your username or e-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
Sorry, we're still checking this file's contents to make sure it's safe to download. Please try again in a few minutes.
Sorry, our virus scanner detected that this file isn't safe to download.