Question

AFS compatible with GA version 2019-02-11 available?

  • 19 March 2019
  • 9 replies
  • 1066 views

Badge +1
Is there any available AFS ?
Settings-Upgrade Software shows - no available versions for upgrade as well as no current version installed

9 replies

I downloaded "Files" version 3.2.0.2 - the qcow2 and .json files from the portal. I edited the .json file to add 2019-02-11 to the list of AOS versions supported, then uploaded them using Prism. Was then able to create a file server. Its "in progress" so I'll update this as I get it working.
Badge +1
I downloaded "Files" version 3.2.0.2 - the qcow2 and .json files from the portal. I edited the .json file to add 2019-02-11 to the list of AOS versions supported, then uploaded them using Prism. Was then able to create a file server. Its "in progress" so I'll update this as I get it working.
Thank you for information.
I've tried to update metadata for version 3.2.0.1 - after several attempts it succeeded to deploy on single node cluster. and only after increasing VM memory to 16GB (instead of 12GB by default).
But still no luck on 3-node cluster.
My test File Server is up and running and shares are working. This is a 3-node cluster of CE.
Badge +1
My test File Server is up and running and shares are working. This is a 3-node cluster of CE.
In my case one of nodes failes to get configured properly.
And after 15 minutes of waiting FS to start it starts rollback operation.
Happy to capture any settings that might help you (and others).
Badge +1
Happy to capture any settings that might help you (and others).
Thank you in advance.
Let's check the HW configuration for the CE nodes and AFS VMs.
Sorry for the wrap. Like my clever names :-)

Host Name CPU Usage CPU Capacity Memory Usage Memory Capacity Total Disk Usage Disk Usage Disk IOPS Disk IO B/W Disk IO Latency
NTNX-140f4e94-A 17.57% 14.02 GHz 61.65% 46.93 GiB 366.68 GiB of 15.22 TiB 2.35% 22 247 KBps 0.73 ms
NTNX-52363d8d-A 18.94% 14.02 GHz 50.08% 46.93 GiB 329.45 GiB of 15.22 TiB 2.11% 27 393 KBps 1.1 ms
NTNX-65b3cbb1-A 20.90% 14.02 GHz 50.06% 46.93 GiB 330.64 GiB of 15.22 TiB 2.12% 28 399 KBps 1.21 ms

VM Name Host Cores Memory Capacity Storage CPU Usage Memory Usage Controller Avg IO Latency Backup and Recovery Capable Flash Mode
NTNX-afstest-1 NTNX-65b3cbb1-A/AHV 4 12 GiB 7.06 GiB / 102 GiB 4.26% 52.10% 2.41 ms Yes No
NTNX-afstest-2 NTNX-52363d8d-A/AHV 4 12 GiB 7.14 GiB / 102 GiB 3.91% 52.14% 2.76 ms Yes No
NTNX-afstest-3 NTNX-140f4e94-A/AHV 4 12 GiB 7.65 GiB / 102 GiB 4.42% 90.21% 2.73 ms Yes No
Badge +1
Sorry for the wrap. Like my clever names :-)

Host Name CPU Usage CPU Capacity Memory Usage Memory Capacity Total Disk Usage Disk Usage Disk IOPS Disk IO B/W Disk IO Latency
NTNX-140f4e94-A 17.57% 14.02 GHz 61.65% 46.93 GiB 366.68 GiB of 15.22 TiB 2.35% 22 247 KBps 0.73 ms
NTNX-52363d8d-A 18.94% 14.02 GHz 50.08% 46.93 GiB 329.45 GiB of 15.22 TiB 2.11% 27 393 KBps 1.1 ms
NTNX-65b3cbb1-A 20.90% 14.02 GHz 50.06% 46.93 GiB 330.64 GiB of 15.22 TiB 2.12% 28 399 KBps 1.21 ms

VM Name Host Cores Memory Capacity Storage CPU Usage Memory Usage Controller Avg IO Latency Backup and Recovery Capable Flash Mode
NTNX-afstest-1 NTNX-65b3cbb1-A/AHV 4 12 GiB 7.06 GiB / 102 GiB 4.26% 52.10% 2.41 ms Yes No
NTNX-afstest-2 NTNX-52363d8d-A/AHV 4 12 GiB 7.14 GiB / 102 GiB 3.91% 52.14% 2.76 ms Yes No
NTNX-afstest-3 NTNX-140f4e94-A/AHV 4 12 GiB 7.65 GiB / 102 GiB 4.42% 90.21% 2.73 ms Yes No

Thank you for information.

As for the difference is in CPU and storage space.
In my lab it seems like one of the afs vms (sometimes two of them) doesn't get settings properly or smth like that.
The node which I consider to be deployed successfully ends with add/remove nutanix slices and vm guest hostname renaming. While some of them fail to do it and stuck after cloud-init script.

I wonder if there is a way to push them...
Do anybody have a sample JSON file to use for comparison? I've tried 3.2 and 3.5 and neither can upload. I get software not compatible message on upload.

Reply