The docs for GET v2/vms state the following:
Virtual Machine disk information and network information are not included by default as fetching these are expensive operations. These can be included by setting the include_vmdisk_config and include_vmnic_config flags respectively.
Based on this I was planning on leveraging these flags for performance reasons when listing VM's, but I'm not sure they are working. I'm testing against a Acropolis system running 126.96.36.199.
I diffed the JSON responses from Swagger when include_vmdisk_config and include_vmnic_config were:
The JSON is identical for 1 and 3, which I expected, but for every VM the vm_disk_info and vm_nics fields are populated for each VM. When I diffed 1 and 2 the only difference is that each disk reports its size.
Is this expected?
I tried this with 5.0 and the output is different when using
I am using 5.0 and ESXi 6.0
Let´s try to double check this with eng. But I believe the output should be similar with AHV. I will try to test it as soon I have an AHV cluster available.
The CE edition does not provide the v2.0 API right now.
I have Acropolis 188.8.131.52 running if you want to see the API output?
I also have CE running which has the v2.0 API (it does not have the v3 API).
Which version are you using regarding the CE edition.
CE AOS 2016.10.12 and Nutanix Hypervisor 20150513 do not accept https://192.168.178.130:9440/PrismGateway/services/rest/v2.0/ requests at my lab. Would be nice to understand the difference.
I'm running the 2016.12.22 build. I believe that was the first non-EA build with Asterisx functionality. I'm planning on upgrading to the latest which is 2017.01.10 at some point.
I tested with CE edition today. You are right. The details with parameters are only a little bit more. Maybe the assumption that include disk statistics etc. is only expensive using vsphere? And the output with including ?include_vm_disk_config=true&include_vm_nic_config=true is a little bit different at my homelab. for example size is included!
hey @regana - following up on old threads tonight, did you ever get to the bottom of this or is this still outstanding?